Gov wants to sell 3 million acres of public land

wildlife-1123661_640

A congressman in Utah introduced a bill that would allow for the sale of more than 3 million acres of public land across 10 Western states. It was a bill that was reintroduced and didn’t pass before because it was unpopular then and remains unpopular. The language of the bill is unfriendly with sportsmen and lawmakers alike.

Chaffetz failed to find a co-sponsor for this bill when he introduced it last year. He’s attempting to do it again.


Excerpt from FieldandStream:

Congressman Jason Chaffetz of Utah reintroduced a bill (H.R. 621) that calls for the sale of 3.3 million acres of federally owned federally owned public lands across 10 Western states. The lands, according to a statement issued by Chaffetz’s office, “serve no purpose” for taxpayers, and the disposal of these properties would relieve the federal government of management costs, as well as provide economic opportunities for rural communities.

The lands in question were identified as being suitable for sale by the Clinton Administration. But whether the lands “serve no purpose” and are worth disposing of remains up for debate. Much of the land that could be sold is popular among hunters, fishermen, and campers. Moreover, the BLM notes that land once identified as available for disposal may later have been found to contain oil-and-gas potential, and be home to threatened and endangered species. The bill, however, does not make clear exactly which parcels identified by the Clinton Administration may be sold.

Chaffetz also reintroduced a bill (H.R. 622) that aims to rid the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service of their law-enforcement functions. The bill calls for deputizing local law enforcement, who will then carry out policing BLM and Forest Service lands. “If there is a problem, your local sheriff is the first and best line of defense,” said Chaffetz in a statement. “By restoring local control in law enforcement, we enable federal agencies and county sheriffs to each focus on their respective core missions.”


Contact Jason:
Congressman Jason Chaffetz
Congressman Jason Twitter



Source

Tags , ,

Related posts

40 Comments

  1. Eric Pledger said:

    No doubt Todd. Here in East NC the warden gives a pair of chrome bracelets to any one they find on all but 10% of the federal land.

  2. Nicolas Goddard said:

    Dems wanna lock it up and charge you to use it and the Conservatives wanna take it away and sell it to their corporate buddies for kick backs.

  3. Randall-Sherry Adams said:

    Constitutionally speaking, the Federal government isn’t allowed to own any property except what is needed for national defense. That said, congress passed bills to allow it anyway. What SHOULD be done is to have these lands given back to the states to either preserve or sell at their discretion. Most of the land was actually take. By mandate from others. Most recently by the BLM or EPA.

  4. Brian Doty said:

    I read the article and as a person would like more land I see no problem here other than how you slanted the article. What read stayed that a majority of the land was currently federally owned. I think it is a great idea to turn land over back to the public. The federal government owns far too much land right now. Hell with amount of land the BLM owns we could kick start a entirely new Homestead Act and have millions of acres still left over.

  5. Carol McDonough said:

    ALL that land was supposed to have been turned over to the states at the time they became states. This land is illegally held by the Feds. It should be turned over to the states and let them decide what happens to their land.

  6. Brian Groby said:

    In reality.. You won’t get no chance at any of it.. The first to buy it will be rich corporations for consumption. This will be insider purchases.. The end..

*

*

Top